Table of Contents
Outline
Introduction
Chapter 1) The Formal Truth Engine
Chapter 2) A Training Writing Method Called a Royal Correspondence
Chapter 3) The Unified Field Theory: What is the Universal Fathering Effect?
Chapter 4) A New World Science: What is Sensory Devolution?
Chapter 5) The Proper Being of a King Writ Large Versus the Improper Becoming of an Emperor Needing Circumcision
Chapter 6) The peripheral dichotomies, fabricated movements, and concocted rights: What are the False Powers of Manipulation?
Chapter 7) The People's Proclamation to Intermittent Sovereignty
Saturday, July 30, 2016
Friday, July 29, 2016
Chapter 1. The Formal Truth Engine
Formal Truth Engine: A rational thought process involving the comparing and contrasting of the many dogmatic dichotomies that we accept today with a more formal and truer dichotomy of a king and wretch -- a best-principled dichotomy so to speak. I say these faultier dichotomies are dogmatic because they are accepted today without giving the matter much thought.
My argument here is that the mind of mankind is being blinded today. This deception is being caused by a bombardment of information pertaining to the peripheral dichotomies. In order to return our proper perception, we need to establish a central formal dichotomy in which to focus our attention upon.
Hopefully, in the future, when others continue desiring to speak with us about matters surrounding the peripheral dichotomies, we will know well enough about the harm such nonsense is causing and walk away.
The primary focus we should all share today is upon both the metaphoric figure of a king at one end of a political spectrum and his inverse of a wretch at the other end of it. In contrast, the political spectrum that we accept today is an ancient left/right golden mean scale developed by Aristotle.
Spiritually speaking, my argument claims that there exists an important formal dichotomy. This best-principled among all lessor dichotomies exists between what is the holiest of dichotomies on one hand, it being the ideal relationship between Christ as the husband and the church as His bride and, on the other hand, the more practical dogmatic dichotomies that we accept without giving the matter much thought.
In other words, while it is important to accept the holy dichotomy as ideal, we need to understand also that a formal reality exists before us out in plain sight when opening our eyes.
Without much thought, we split reality dogmatically into many dichotomies. One such dogmatic dichotomy determines the color black to be at the end of a color spectrum and the color white at the other. Another is male at one end and that of a female at the other. I think of these dogmatic dichotomies as peripheral or faulty dichotomies.
Again, to open our eyes, we need to place things in perspective. As I am a Christian, this means first recognizing Christ as the most holy dichotomy of Himself as the husband and His people as His bride. Next, we must envision a dynamic inverse of a king located at one unapproachable end of a spectrum versus that of a wretch located at the other unapproachable end of it.
I must pause here to interject that a straight line is unique as it exists only as a product of a finite mind. In other words, if desks lined up in sequence numbered sufficient enough to circle the earth, a line drawn by a student shifting from one chair to the next would not be drawn straight, but would circle. Similarly, all things being relative, as all three variables utilized in the following postulation would be in constant motion, it would be impossible for a student sitting as a reference point to draw a line between a body in space serving as point A, over to that of another body in space as point B.
This is why I refer to this new type of political spectrum as a dynamic inverse.
One can work out problems by utilizing this dynamic inverse. This learning method entails comparing and contrasting the one focused upon formal dichotomy with that of the other lessor informal or, better yet, faultier peripheral dichotomies.
For example, to the question asked about what are the inductive and deductive methods of reasoning? Well, my answer to that question is, while the worthless wretch at one end of the spectrum would be ignorant of such processes having other more desperate matters to attend to, the king, at the other end of it, would surround himself with aristocratic officials who understood how both of these rational truth engines function.
The King's deemed experts would understand how Socrates in ancient Greece developed a rational inductive method that he coined 'the Dialectic.' This method today is often referred to as 'The Socratic Teaching Method.' Later, building upon the rational foundation laid down by both Socrates and Plato, Aristotle developed the backbone of present science as formal logic, the four causes, and what is today recognized as deductive reasoning.
Without the utilization of this Truth Engine with it being a process of juxtaposing the many faultier peripheral dichotomies with that of a best-principled formal dichotomy, our minds are being deceived into viewing reality as Marxism versus capitalism, male versus female, rich against poor, black against white, homosexual versus heterosexual, and so on for infinity. The Truth Engine works by defining how the polar ends of these peripheral dichotomies aren't truly mutually exclusive of the other.
Indeed, Marxism and capitalism are not mutually exclusive polar ends of the other, but both are evil. The common denominator they share as enemies against the people is how they both threaten to take away our natural rights. As a drunken Marxist is attempting to subvert us constantly of our rights, the equally drunken capitalist simply doesn't acknowledge that such rights exist.
We need to stop thinking of reality in terms of linear opposites and perceiving them more in terms of a dynamic inverse. Using gravity as an example, understanding it in a linear way, we would tend to envision its opposite repelling force as a linear opposite. As gravity appears to pull on us in a straight linear fashion, so a repelling force should appear to be pushing us away in a straight linear fashion as well. This perception is a fallacy however.
In order to begin to understand how the universe truly works, while the finite mind does perceive gravity to exist in a linear fashion as a force pulling on our being straight ahead and forward, a better way one should think about an inverse repelling force opposing it would be that it is pushing us away from the center towards the sides in all directions. As this repelling force is pushing away towards all sides, so I refer to that phenomena as 'Centerpoint-Friction."
Again, Centerpoint Friction and Gravity are not linear opposites as that is just how the finite mind tends to interpret the relationship between them. Instead, they exist as dynamic inverses. Similarly, while the original understanding of the dichotomy between a king and a wretch will begin to view them along a spectrum that is a linear opposite, ones mind should persevere to develop a more mature understanding of their relationship together as a round dynamic inverse.
My argument here is that the mind of mankind is being blinded today. This deception is being caused by a bombardment of information pertaining to the peripheral dichotomies. In order to return our proper perception, we need to establish a central formal dichotomy in which to focus our attention upon.
Hopefully, in the future, when others continue desiring to speak with us about matters surrounding the peripheral dichotomies, we will know well enough about the harm such nonsense is causing and walk away.
The primary focus we should all share today is upon both the metaphoric figure of a king at one end of a political spectrum and his inverse of a wretch at the other end of it. In contrast, the political spectrum that we accept today is an ancient left/right golden mean scale developed by Aristotle.
Spiritually speaking, my argument claims that there exists an important formal dichotomy. This best-principled among all lessor dichotomies exists between what is the holiest of dichotomies on one hand, it being the ideal relationship between Christ as the husband and the church as His bride and, on the other hand, the more practical dogmatic dichotomies that we accept without giving the matter much thought.
In other words, while it is important to accept the holy dichotomy as ideal, we need to understand also that a formal reality exists before us out in plain sight when opening our eyes.
Without much thought, we split reality dogmatically into many dichotomies. One such dogmatic dichotomy determines the color black to be at the end of a color spectrum and the color white at the other. Another is male at one end and that of a female at the other. I think of these dogmatic dichotomies as peripheral or faulty dichotomies.
Again, to open our eyes, we need to place things in perspective. As I am a Christian, this means first recognizing Christ as the most holy dichotomy of Himself as the husband and His people as His bride. Next, we must envision a dynamic inverse of a king located at one unapproachable end of a spectrum versus that of a wretch located at the other unapproachable end of it.
I must pause here to interject that a straight line is unique as it exists only as a product of a finite mind. In other words, if desks lined up in sequence numbered sufficient enough to circle the earth, a line drawn by a student shifting from one chair to the next would not be drawn straight, but would circle. Similarly, all things being relative, as all three variables utilized in the following postulation would be in constant motion, it would be impossible for a student sitting as a reference point to draw a line between a body in space serving as point A, over to that of another body in space as point B.
This is why I refer to this new type of political spectrum as a dynamic inverse.
One can work out problems by utilizing this dynamic inverse. This learning method entails comparing and contrasting the one focused upon formal dichotomy with that of the other lessor informal or, better yet, faultier peripheral dichotomies.
For example, to the question asked about what are the inductive and deductive methods of reasoning? Well, my answer to that question is, while the worthless wretch at one end of the spectrum would be ignorant of such processes having other more desperate matters to attend to, the king, at the other end of it, would surround himself with aristocratic officials who understood how both of these rational truth engines function.
The King's deemed experts would understand how Socrates in ancient Greece developed a rational inductive method that he coined 'the Dialectic.' This method today is often referred to as 'The Socratic Teaching Method.' Later, building upon the rational foundation laid down by both Socrates and Plato, Aristotle developed the backbone of present science as formal logic, the four causes, and what is today recognized as deductive reasoning.
Without the utilization of this Truth Engine with it being a process of juxtaposing the many faultier peripheral dichotomies with that of a best-principled formal dichotomy, our minds are being deceived into viewing reality as Marxism versus capitalism, male versus female, rich against poor, black against white, homosexual versus heterosexual, and so on for infinity. The Truth Engine works by defining how the polar ends of these peripheral dichotomies aren't truly mutually exclusive of the other.
Indeed, Marxism and capitalism are not mutually exclusive polar ends of the other, but both are evil. The common denominator they share as enemies against the people is how they both threaten to take away our natural rights. As a drunken Marxist is attempting to subvert us constantly of our rights, the equally drunken capitalist simply doesn't acknowledge that such rights exist.
We need to stop thinking of reality in terms of linear opposites and perceiving them more in terms of a dynamic inverse. Using gravity as an example, understanding it in a linear way, we would tend to envision its opposite repelling force as a linear opposite. As gravity appears to pull on us in a straight linear fashion, so a repelling force should appear to be pushing us away in a straight linear fashion as well. This perception is a fallacy however.
In order to begin to understand how the universe truly works, while the finite mind does perceive gravity to exist in a linear fashion as a force pulling on our being straight ahead and forward, a better way one should think about an inverse repelling force opposing it would be that it is pushing us away from the center towards the sides in all directions. As this repelling force is pushing away towards all sides, so I refer to that phenomena as 'Centerpoint-Friction."
Again, Centerpoint Friction and Gravity are not linear opposites as that is just how the finite mind tends to interpret the relationship between them. Instead, they exist as dynamic inverses. Similarly, while the original understanding of the dichotomy between a king and a wretch will begin to view them along a spectrum that is a linear opposite, ones mind should persevere to develop a more mature understanding of their relationship together as a round dynamic inverse.
Thursday, July 28, 2016
Preface to Uncle Emanuel's Steps to Understanding Our American Civil Purpose
(Our American Civil Purpose)
Preface
To cover up information in order to stumble up God’s children is not an intelligent endeavor. The gospel of Christ was spoken freely out in the open by the very least one of us to ever live. Indeed, from all He ever understood of Himself, Christ confessed to being the very least offspring born and raised among the most wretched. After all, He did refer to Himself only as the Son of Man.
In contrast to the Son of Man, a ‘Son of God‘ is exalted as a princely offspring of a king. As, on one hand, the classification of ‘God‘ denotes the intimate designation of one who is a friend, on the other, the classification of ’man’ denotes the impersonal designation of one who is a stranger. My claim that Christ the Son of man be the living Son of God is my own faithful proclamation of His holy stature and not His!
Similar to Christ, Americans today are worthless children of a wretch. Being this American is an absolute. Indeed, being so is not a matter of opinion. It is neither this nor that, left nor right, liberal nor conservative, nor Democratic and Republican. The certainty and the assurance that we are Americans is established soundly in formal natural law. After all, our nation is an unofficial one as it was never established by officials according to established legal precedence, but upon a formal foundation of, by, and for the people. This can be substantiated within U.S. Constitution which is not a single document, but has two kinds of laws instituted within it. One kind is based upon those prior Old World traditions of legal precedence that were carried over within the beings of our Founding Fathers. The other kind are based upon formal natural law. Within the portion of the U.S. Constitution that is formal, natural law establishes an economy of natural rights which are our Bill of Rights.
The United States today is set apart from the Old World not because of legal precedence, but because of this formal natural right economy.
Today, neither Marxism and capitalism are friends of our natural right economy. As they share a similar goal as enemies of the people, these seeming differing political philosophies are not mutually exclusive. They both wish to disarm and confuse stripping us of what we can never lose. Indeed, as the Marxists of today continue in their scheming to subvert us of our natural rights, the arrogant capitalists continue in ignorance as they don't even acknowledge their unalienable existence. One cannot take away that which is etched so indelibly upon the soul, but can confuse and disarm by convincing others that it isn’t there. Metaphorically speaking, the American people were never intended to be prostituted so shamefully by two competing pimps.
The necessary tyranny of the federal government today does not govern over the world’s greatest business executives, military leaders, lawyers, doctors, or bankers -- that is all Old World business; but, we of the United States possess the greatest of people when we are left free to express our American Civil Purpose.
*Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins
Prime Minister of These United States
*Literally means ‘founder.' A new kind of leader other than a lawyer. 'Fd.' is a title given to a prime minister or deputy prime minister of the United States.
Preface
To cover up information in order to stumble up God’s children is not an intelligent endeavor. The gospel of Christ was spoken freely out in the open by the very least one of us to ever live. Indeed, from all He ever understood of Himself, Christ confessed to being the very least offspring born and raised among the most wretched. After all, He did refer to Himself only as the Son of Man.
But Jesus replied, "Foxes have dens to live in, and birds have nests, but the Son of Man has no place even to lay his head." Luke 9:58
In contrast to the Son of Man, a ‘Son of God‘ is exalted as a princely offspring of a king. As, on one hand, the classification of ‘God‘ denotes the intimate designation of one who is a friend, on the other, the classification of ’man’ denotes the impersonal designation of one who is a stranger. My claim that Christ the Son of man be the living Son of God is my own faithful proclamation of His holy stature and not His!
Similar to Christ, Americans today are worthless children of a wretch. Being this American is an absolute. Indeed, being so is not a matter of opinion. It is neither this nor that, left nor right, liberal nor conservative, nor Democratic and Republican. The certainty and the assurance that we are Americans is established soundly in formal natural law. After all, our nation is an unofficial one as it was never established by officials according to established legal precedence, but upon a formal foundation of, by, and for the people. This can be substantiated within U.S. Constitution which is not a single document, but has two kinds of laws instituted within it. One kind is based upon those prior Old World traditions of legal precedence that were carried over within the beings of our Founding Fathers. The other kind are based upon formal natural law. Within the portion of the U.S. Constitution that is formal, natural law establishes an economy of natural rights which are our Bill of Rights.
The United States today is set apart from the Old World not because of legal precedence, but because of this formal natural right economy.
Today, neither Marxism and capitalism are friends of our natural right economy. As they share a similar goal as enemies of the people, these seeming differing political philosophies are not mutually exclusive. They both wish to disarm and confuse stripping us of what we can never lose. Indeed, as the Marxists of today continue in their scheming to subvert us of our natural rights, the arrogant capitalists continue in ignorance as they don't even acknowledge their unalienable existence. One cannot take away that which is etched so indelibly upon the soul, but can confuse and disarm by convincing others that it isn’t there. Metaphorically speaking, the American people were never intended to be prostituted so shamefully by two competing pimps.
The necessary tyranny of the federal government today does not govern over the world’s greatest business executives, military leaders, lawyers, doctors, or bankers -- that is all Old World business; but, we of the United States possess the greatest of people when we are left free to express our American Civil Purpose.
*Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins
Prime Minister of These United States
*Literally means ‘founder.' A new kind of leader other than a lawyer. 'Fd.' is a title given to a prime minister or deputy prime minister of the United States.
Monday, July 25, 2016
Understanding Our American Civil Purpose: Seven Steps by Uncle Emanuel Watkins
Outline
Understanding Our American Civil Purpose in Seven Steps
by Uncle Emanuel Watkins
1) The Formal Truth Engine: A Rationl Method For the New World
2) A Royal Correspondence: A Formal Writing Method to Supersede that of the Classic Essay.
3) Science and Sensory Devolution
4) Epistemology and The Fathering Effect
5) A New Leadership Of, By, and For the People: A Fellowship of Prime Ministers
6) The False Powers of Manipulation.
7) The Gospel of Christ: How the Natural Rights Came to be Etched Upon Our Souls and Justification For the People to Intervene at Times Into the Affairs of Our Government.
Understanding Our American Civil Purpose in Seven Steps
by Uncle Emanuel Watkins
1) The Formal Truth Engine: A Rationl Method For the New World
2) A Royal Correspondence: A Formal Writing Method to Supersede that of the Classic Essay.
3) Science and Sensory Devolution
4) Epistemology and The Fathering Effect
5) A New Leadership Of, By, and For the People: A Fellowship of Prime Ministers
6) The False Powers of Manipulation.
7) The Gospel of Christ: How the Natural Rights Came to be Etched Upon Our Souls and Justification For the People to Intervene at Times Into the Affairs of Our Government.
What is The Formal Truth Engine?
Formal Truth Engine: A rational thought process involving the comparing and contrasting of the many dogmatic dichotomies accepted today with that of a more formal and truer dichotomy. This formal dichotomy utilizes a metaphorical king at one end of a political spectrum and his inverse of a metaphorical wretch at the other end of it.
Spiritually speaking, my argument makes the claim that there exists another formal dichotomy existing between what is the holy dichotomy of Christ (the husband) and the church (the bride), with this marriage provided to us by God, and what are the more practical dogmatic dichotomies.
In other words, while it is important to understand the holy dichotomy, we need to also understand the reality that exists before us when we open our eyes.
Without much thought, reality is split dogmatically by our finite minds into many dichotomies. One such dichotomy places the color black at one end of a spectrum and that of the color white at the other. Another dogmatic dichotomy is male at one end and female at the other. I think of these dogmatic dichotomies as peripheral or faulty dichotomies.
Opening our eyes, by utilized the Formal Truth Engine, we begin to envision a king located at one unapproachable end of a spectrum versus that of a wretch located at the other unapproachabe end of it. One then works out the process by comparing and contrasting this most formal of all dichotomies with all the other informal and more faulty peripheral dichotomies.
For example, to the question of what are inductive and deductive reasoning? Well, my answer to that question is while the wretch is ignorant of such processes, the king has surrounded himself with officials who understand how both of these rational truth engines function.
Again, some of the informal dichotomies accepted by us today might be Marxism versus capitalism, male versus female, rich against poor, black against white, homosexual versus heterosexual, and so on. The idea here is to define how these peripheral dichotomies exist mutually exclusive or a polar opposite direction of each other. One utilizes the Formal Truth Engine to juxtapose the peripheral dichotomies with that of the one true dichotomy.
In other words, I reject the left / right political spectrum. It projects the fallacy of a square linear opposite. In place of it, I insert a round 'dynamic inverse.'
What is the difference between a linear opposite and a dynamic inverse? Well, I explain this not by the process of science, but by an example of epistemology. In other words, it isn't that we don't know, but why we aren't able to perceive what already exists in plain sight. Utilize gravity as an example by thinking of it as a force pulling us straight ahead towards it. In contrast to gravity, in our finite limited minds, we would tend to envision that any potential repelling force would behave in an exact linear opposite direction. It would be pushing us away. This perception is a fallacy however.
In order to begin to understand how the universe truly works, while the mind interprets gravity in linear fashion as a force pulling us straight ahead and forward, one should think of its inverse repelling force as pushing us away from the center in all directions towards the sides. As the repelling force is pushing away towards all sides, so I have referred to that phenomena as 'Centerpoint-Friction."
The forces of Centerpoint Friction and Gravity are not linear opposites as that is how our minds tend to interpret the relationship between them. Instead, they exist as dynamic inverses. Similarly, while the original understanding of the dichotomy between a king and a wretch will be along a spectrum that is a linear opposite, one should persevere to develop the understanding of their relationship to more of a round dynamic inverse.
Spiritually speaking, my argument makes the claim that there exists another formal dichotomy existing between what is the holy dichotomy of Christ (the husband) and the church (the bride), with this marriage provided to us by God, and what are the more practical dogmatic dichotomies.
In other words, while it is important to understand the holy dichotomy, we need to also understand the reality that exists before us when we open our eyes.
Without much thought, reality is split dogmatically by our finite minds into many dichotomies. One such dichotomy places the color black at one end of a spectrum and that of the color white at the other. Another dogmatic dichotomy is male at one end and female at the other. I think of these dogmatic dichotomies as peripheral or faulty dichotomies.
Opening our eyes, by utilized the Formal Truth Engine, we begin to envision a king located at one unapproachable end of a spectrum versus that of a wretch located at the other unapproachabe end of it. One then works out the process by comparing and contrasting this most formal of all dichotomies with all the other informal and more faulty peripheral dichotomies.
For example, to the question of what are inductive and deductive reasoning? Well, my answer to that question is while the wretch is ignorant of such processes, the king has surrounded himself with officials who understand how both of these rational truth engines function.
Again, some of the informal dichotomies accepted by us today might be Marxism versus capitalism, male versus female, rich against poor, black against white, homosexual versus heterosexual, and so on. The idea here is to define how these peripheral dichotomies exist mutually exclusive or a polar opposite direction of each other. One utilizes the Formal Truth Engine to juxtapose the peripheral dichotomies with that of the one true dichotomy.
In other words, I reject the left / right political spectrum. It projects the fallacy of a square linear opposite. In place of it, I insert a round 'dynamic inverse.'
What is the difference between a linear opposite and a dynamic inverse? Well, I explain this not by the process of science, but by an example of epistemology. In other words, it isn't that we don't know, but why we aren't able to perceive what already exists in plain sight. Utilize gravity as an example by thinking of it as a force pulling us straight ahead towards it. In contrast to gravity, in our finite limited minds, we would tend to envision that any potential repelling force would behave in an exact linear opposite direction. It would be pushing us away. This perception is a fallacy however.
In order to begin to understand how the universe truly works, while the mind interprets gravity in linear fashion as a force pulling us straight ahead and forward, one should think of its inverse repelling force as pushing us away from the center in all directions towards the sides. As the repelling force is pushing away towards all sides, so I have referred to that phenomena as 'Centerpoint-Friction."
The forces of Centerpoint Friction and Gravity are not linear opposites as that is how our minds tend to interpret the relationship between them. Instead, they exist as dynamic inverses. Similarly, while the original understanding of the dichotomy between a king and a wretch will be along a spectrum that is a linear opposite, one should persevere to develop the understanding of their relationship to more of a round dynamic inverse.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)