Every university within the United States today should no longer be deemed Universities of higher learning, but Diversities of Mid-Level learning.
Rather than abolish these Diversities today, we the people now preserve these schools relegating them to Mid-Level.
Next, of, by, and for the people of the United States, for our nation, I now establish in place of these Diversities a New World university of the highest learning. The reason for establishing this university is to train New World leaders to supplant the lawyers that are now in governmental office.
As you all should know better, consider yourselves now held to a greater judgment under the Light of Truth.
Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins 12/13/2016
Prime Minister of these United States
Tuesday, December 13, 2016
Thursday, November 3, 2016
Sunday, October 16, 2016
Here is a copy of a leaflet created by me. I handed it out during a campaign I held while attending college about sixteen years.
I made an attempt to answer this question myself. Think of the five images of the progressing Native American above as Christ. The whole scale above represents a dimensional truth split into five parts. As the middle image of maturity is a transition, the first two images represents a gradation process towards maturity. In contrast, the last two images represents a withering process towards prophecy.
During the time Christ was the Messiah, all of creation advanced towards maturity which is represented by the first two images above. After Christ had finished fulfilling the prophecy -- He was made to come upon this earth to be with us in the flesh by the law -- He then rejected both the law within the temple and within the marketplace which, in this case, is represented by the last two images. As I have mentioned often, the disciples did reject the temple, but they didn't understand enough to further reject the marketplace. This time of rejection of the law by Christ represents His withering towards both the cross and the prophecy.
I was wrong about the formula at the bottom. I have sense developed it better. Many years have been spent by me developing this new American philosophy that I refer to as our American Civil Purpose.
Saturday, September 17, 2016
What is formal post university education?
As we age, the mind first loses its plasticity before it begins a long duration of withering away. We recognize this time as the age of wisdom. My argument is that we should continue advancing our minds during this withering stage by the adoption of both a new truth engine and a writing method.
The 'formal' truth engine I speak of incorporates a dynamic inverse between that of a king enthroned at one unapproachable end of a political scale and a wretch outcast at the other unapproachable end of it.
Similarly, the new writing method I speak of reduces both the author and his and her reading audience down to a metaphorical pairing of a king and a wretch. As such authors would be reducing themselves down to writing as kings, he or she would also be narrowing their audience down to a lone reader by reducing the entire population of the world to within the lone being of a homeless wretch.
I call this new writing method a 'royal correspondence.' The writing method is quite focused as it always involves just two people. As the kingly author represents the authority of a necessary tyranny, the wretched reader represents the people.
In this way, people can further advance beyond their university learning! Again, the reason for creating such a post university education is to weed out every legal attorney now in political office. In order to achieve this, the United States needs to develop a new type of formal leader.
The 'formal' truth engine I speak of incorporates a dynamic inverse between that of a king enthroned at one unapproachable end of a political scale and a wretch outcast at the other unapproachable end of it.
Similarly, the new writing method I speak of reduces both the author and his and her reading audience down to a metaphorical pairing of a king and a wretch. As such authors would be reducing themselves down to writing as kings, he or she would also be narrowing their audience down to a lone reader by reducing the entire population of the world to within the lone being of a homeless wretch.
I call this new writing method a 'royal correspondence.' The writing method is quite focused as it always involves just two people. As the kingly author represents the authority of a necessary tyranny, the wretched reader represents the people.
In this way, people can further advance beyond their university learning! Again, the reason for creating such a post university education is to weed out every legal attorney now in political office. In order to achieve this, the United States needs to develop a new type of formal leader.
Saturday, August 27, 2016
Chapter 5) The Narrowing of Authority: Circumcising the Improper Becomings of an Emperor to that of the Proper Being of a King-Writ-Large
Part I.
Our American president
should not be a king
In place of the former British Crown that once ruled over the American colonies, our Founding Fathers did not take a dominant position as legal officials over the people. Indeed, as victors over the British in the American Revolutionary War, they would have been justified in doing so. And in so being new members of an American aristocracy, the act of propping up a new king would have been more beneficial to them economically as well. Instead, they stepped down from the high position of a podium in order to sit meekly among a congregation -- of, by, and for the people as Abraham Lincoln once so eloquently expressed a performance they put on within a masterpiece. So, today, the president of the United States should not be possessing of executive privilege. Indeed, such drunken behavior is the most awful contempt that one can ever commit against our blessed American Civil-Purpose.
Therefore, consider yourselves warned. As the American people today are God's children, Jesus proclaimed that even a seeming minor infraction of stumbling up His children to be an unforgivable offense!!
Luke 17:
2 It would be better to be thrown into the *sea with a millstone hung around your neck than to cause one of these little ones to fall into sin.
3. So watch yourselves!*This portion of Luke is dealing with the Jewish and Islam birthright. Paradoxically, the blessed gift of the birthright is not a virtue, but a necessary evil born out from the false virtue (fruit) of equality. This is why so much evil is being manifested over in the Middle East today. Very few of the religious people living in and around that region are willing to forever forfeit their birthrights for the sake of a child. Wrapping a millstone around ones neck relegates one to the bottom of the sea. Scientifically speaking, today, the lowest forms of life can be found at the bottom of the sea. In contrast, the lowest wretch, as horrible as her nature might be, stands at the ready willing to make such a sacrifice for the sake of her worthless offspring!
As you all hold high responsible positions in our government today and should know better about the evil things that you do, so consider yourselves held to an even **greater penalty under His light of Truth.
**In the seventh chapter which is the last part of my seven part argument, I show justification for this intermittent intervention by the people into the affairs of government.
***Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins
08/27/2016
***This title means 'Founder' and is to be worn by prime ministers. American Prime Ministry is a new formal political party established to challenge the old legal two party system! It is a formal authority that has been raised up among the people and not of, by, and for officials. He and / or she has been trained as a new kind of leader to supersede legal attorneys. Moreover, the corrupt two party system is a prior concept that was brought over from the Old World.
Part II.
A King Writ Large
A King Writ Large
Indeed, as already stated, our Founders, when they formed a new nation, did not take the official legal route of crowning a new flesh and blood king. Rather, while standing upon an existing foundation already established for them by their own founders, they instituted and established a King-Writ-Large government. Even today, this three part government remains established metaphorically as an executive, a legislator, and a judge.
While it takes some effort to appreciate what is our American Civil Purpose, it is quite easy to understand what it is not. Indeed, it was never the intentions of our Founding Fathers to mislead and deceive the American people. The two-party system today is behaving like two competing pimps treating us as a dumb whore, dividing us against ourselves, and fighting over us. As any divorce from tyranny is justified under God, such similar pimping today is likewise unforgivable. Indeed, it is true that the document of Declaration of Independence rightfully divorced the American people out from under the rule of an unjust Crown, and, because of this, that our Civil Purpose is justified today under God. It is also true that the behavior of the king of England was that of a wayward prince (Emperor): That a British Crown of aristocrats had schemed together to benefit by further elevating the power of a propped up king to that of a wayward prince. And, finally, it is true that his military power spread over much of the world making king George IV a warmongering imperial Emperor (the sun never set on the British Empire ~ Christopher North). Meanwhile, while he was behaving in such an improper wicked fashion, in outward appearance, he was pretending to rule as a proper noble king.
So, the American people today are not a whore! Under God's supreme judgement, because the prior Declaration of Independence stood as our rightful divorce from tyranny, the U.S. Constitution stands today as our rightful marriage to a new authority.
The above proclamation is not a matter of perpetual dispute. Indeed, being a New World American is not a matter of opinion! Regarding the highest court and its judgment, the U.S. Constitution was never meant to be something needing legal interpretation. Again, the source of this type of sophisticated argument is articulate attorneys farting eloquently from their mouths. Instead, the U.S. Constitution should be viewed as two documents pertaining to both Old World legal business and New World formal business.
There is a difference between those past traditions of legal precedence and the present formal truths we possess as our unalienable natural rights. While the legal bullies in the past were always the ones who knew what they were talking about or else, more thoughtful formal types of thinkers during that time like John Locke had to cower hiding from such nonsense. Yet, even today, similar legal bullies still pretend to know what they blabber on and on about.
These legal bullies today don't appreciate that the U.S. Constitution contains two kinds of laws! They speak in hollow words about it because they do not recognize it as two documents! While one document pertains to the prior legal business of the Old World, the other one pertains to the present formal business of the New.
Today, it is the formal business of the United States that sets us apart from the rest of the world and not its legal business. After all, the legal business existed prior as it was brought over from the Old World. Indeed, the United States does not possess the greatest lawyers of the world, the greatest doctors, the greatest politicians, the greatest business executives, and so on; but, the United States has the greatest and most creative of hard working people when government is wise enough to get out of our way.
So, the U.S. Constitution today is two distinct documents with one pertaining to the legality and traditions of the Old World, and the other pertaining to the formality and the natural rights we posses in the New.
These natural rights etched so indelibly upon our souls even supersede the divine right of kings!! I justify this proclamation in the seventh chapter which is the last part of my overall argument.
Our most supreme of courts today should not be sitting in judgement over the legal marketplace of the Old World; but, rather, that lessor duty should be relegated back to congress. Indeed, Jesus, He being the most supreme Court, rejected such a marketplace. In its place, He created a new marketplace for the worthless offspring of the seven wretches He most cherished, marveled about, and was so charmed by in fact that He allowed them into His flock to become a vital part of His most Holy of ministries.
Being a Christian convert myself, I too am a worthless offspring of these seven wretches.
To prevent the people from the threat of becoming victimized by whore mongers, the function of the Supreme Court should be as this nation's prime media over all other media. They should be our watchdogs against two-party deceit. They should be a beacon of light pertaining to our unalienable Natural Rights. As the soul is absolute, so we can never lose our unalienable rights. However, a network of nationalized media serving today under the power of a wayward prince are now hard at work deceiving the people's understanding about their rights.
So, the United States Constitution today is two unique documents with one of them being both Old World and legal, and the other one being both New World and formal.
Within the seventh chapter which is the final one, I clarify and justify how these natural laws came about.
Friday, August 19, 2016
Chapter 4) A Dialogue About Sensory Devolution
"You'd like to hear more about my argument, huh?" Uncle Emanuel Watkins responded to a request by his forty-two year old nephew John-Boy Watkins to further enlighten him about a theory he developed called 'Sensory Devolution.'
With Uncle Emanuel positioned at the middle of a fishing boat, his nephew John-Boy sat at one side of him and, in turn, John-Boy’s best friend Jim-Bob at the other. John-Boy, his frizzy hair fitted up inside a top-hat, was fishing at the front of the boat with a cane-pole. Both his hat and fishing pole were handed down to him customarily so from distant ancestors through a grandfather lovingly called ‘Gramps’ Watkins. Sitting behind Emanuel at the rear of the boat was Jim-Bob in order to steer its motor. He being forty-two years old as well, the white fellow had decided to decline participating in the conversation opting instead to recline back lazily with his feet propped up.
With Uncle Emanuel positioned at the middle of a fishing boat, his nephew John-Boy sat at one side of him and, in turn, John-Boy’s best friend Jim-Bob at the other. John-Boy, his frizzy hair fitted up inside a top-hat, was fishing at the front of the boat with a cane-pole. Both his hat and fishing pole were handed down to him customarily so from distant ancestors through a grandfather lovingly called ‘Gramps’ Watkins. Sitting behind Emanuel at the rear of the boat was Jim-Bob in order to steer its motor. He being forty-two years old as well, the white fellow had decided to decline participating in the conversation opting instead to recline back lazily with his feet propped up.
"Anyhows . . .zzz." he mumbled into oblivion before falling fast asleep beneath a straw-hat that he had titled down over his face to keep the sun’s rays out.
The three of them had decided upon spending a day together upon the mighty Trinity River. The spot where they were fished was a portion of the river that flowed through a wilderness called the Great Urban Forest. In turn, it was located within the thickest of the thicket in Deep South Dallas. Uncle Emanuel often manages to get himself sandwiched between this lovable pair. Indeed, their two heads when put together never quite make up the totality of a complete brain. Because of the many man-eating catfish prowling beneath the surface of the water, diving into the depths below didn't offer Emanuel a means of escape.
"Please Uncle Emanuel!" his nephew pleaded loudly with him. "I'd very much appreciate it hearing you speak mo' about your theory called 'Sensory Devolution!!'"
Caused by John-Boy's outburst, a deep sleeping Jim-Bob awoke startled and shouted, "'Snort' ANYHOWS!"
"For Pete's sake, son!" Uncle Emanuel tried reasoning with his nephew. "You know how my theories can get so complicated at times that they can even escalate beyond my own understanding!"
After reaching one of his huge anomalies into the bait bucket to grab a fistful of crickets to snack upon, John-Boy insisted further, "Munch, munch, munch . . .. Hey, perhaps in learning what is deadly serious about this world, I could mo' bettah' know things are funny?"
With eyes rolling, Uncle Emanuel sighed and relented, "Well, in that case . . .."
"Great! Once upon a time . . . " John-Boy cheered and clapped his hands. He then sat still in anticipation of the telling of a story. He had learned to control himself in such a fashion just recently by twiddling his thumbs. This was a method taught to him by his good mamma in order to better behave in church.
In spite of his naivety about science, John-Boy did have a point. Seems that he had been robbed at birth from ever possessing the ability of knowing when something was truly funny. Oddly, having never been able to perceive what was comedy, he never seemed to get tired of discussing even the most boring of stuff.
After clearing his throat, Uncle Emanuel began lecturing his nephew utilizing complex compound sentences as he did so incorporating semicolons for style, "On one hand, the universe exists wholly apart from God; and, meanwhile, on the other, God Himself exists beyond even this infinity as an unapproachable Organ.
“Organ?” John-Boy inquired.
“Yes John-Boy,” Uncle Emanuel said clarifying, “He exists as a surrounding Heart. Within the immense empowerment of this immense heart, there also exists a single sense organ. Being single, so it is able to perceive only a single color about itself.
Jim-Bob, as he had to sit up to spit out some tobacco anyway, thought it a good time to butt in, "'Spit.' Anyhows . . ., hey-there Uncle Emanuel!"
"Yes, Jim-Bob? the great black sage twisted around to address what he thought was going to be a question.
"Ever hear the one about that-there hairy-frog I used to keep as a pet back when jest' a wee little feller'?"
As if on cue, a large cat-fish jumped clean out from the river to fall back into it smacking, splashing, and drenching onto the three with water.
"Hey!" and "Anyhows!" both of the forty-two year old best friends shouted in unison cursing at the catfish.
"Hee hee!" Uncle Emanuel endured the cold surprise of the splashing water in order to chuckle at the timing of the happening. He then felt invigorated to add insult to injury. "Whew! Oh boy, would I ever love to hear about that-there hairy frog joke of yours, Jim-Bob. Shoot, I bet I've laughed a hundred times at that joke, it gets better every time you say it, and would so love to laugh at it yet again. Just seems the catfish swimming below aren't too interested."
"What sense organ would that be Uncle Emanuel?" John-Boy inquired managing to maintain focus on the discussion at hand.
"Yes, John-Boy, " Uncle Emanuel continued on with his lecturing twisting around to address John-Boy after refocusing on the topic himself, "I am speaking of the infinite universe in this case. On one hand, what surrounds us is a Heart which is located an unapproachable distance away; meanwhile, on the other hand, the infinite universe itself exists as a lone sense organ."
"What is this thing dat’ you keep calling infinity, Uncle Emauel?" John-Boy asked puzzled while scratching his head.
"Imagine that you are now traveling out in deep space in a rocket ship, John-Boy," Uncle Emanuel said hypothesizing, "Okay, one day you arrive at a wall. After stopping, eating a peanut butter sandwich, and drinking some Kool-aid, you wonder to yourself, “What is on the other side?“
After thinking long and hard on the question, John-Boy replied, "Nothing would be on the other side of that-there wall, Uncle Emanuel."
"Uh, okay . . .," Uncle Emanuel replied shaking his head at the unexpected answer and then having to close his eyes to think about what to say next. Becoming enlightened suddenly, he continued on with his dissertation, "Okay, let's venture away from the topic for a bit in order to consider the theory deeper. Imagine, if you will, a race of human beings evolving out from the thickest of jungles. Such a wilderness would be so dense, in fact, that one would only be able to perceive evidence of a sky above on occasion. As the color green of the jungle would be so dominant, the lesser appearance of the other colors of brown, red, black and so on wouldn’t be considered mutually exclusive of that color, but mere shades of it. The few times that the sky above would peak its light through into the forest would lead the trapped victims to assume the same about the color blue as well. One day, the long journey comes to abrupt end leading the trapped victims to a clearing where they are able to behold a magnificent blue sky opening above them. Up in that blue sky also and seeming to float, they perceive fluffy, whitish, and grayish colored clouds. Again, because of their prior experience in the jungle, these colors are assumed to be shades of green as well.
"Anyhows!" Jim-Bob inquired from the back of the boat in puzzled fashion before adding, "What the dickens, you say?"
"I am arguing here against the present accepted dichotomy of the extreme and opposite colors of black and white, Jim-Bob,” Uncle Emanuel said arguing after twisting around to respond to him. "Such colors are assumed to be mutually exclusive of the other. However, if the universe exists as a lone sense organ, then there must also exist only a single color for it to perceive. In such a case, the sense organ would be blind to that single color. In order for the organ to be able to perceive anything, certain amounts of shadows would need to be caste in the way of the light. I am speaking about a need to create eyes within eyes or, better yet, receptors within receptors. In order to achieve this feat, sensory devolution takes place.
"Anyhows . . ., gee, lots of eyes within eyes, you say?" Jim-Bob inquired with a puzzled look after which he took off his hat (something that he rarely ever did outdoors). He then stood up so that he might sit back down again to do some serious thinking about what in the hell he had just heard. All this nervous action by Jim-Bob left his pale face, freckles, and red hair exposed to very much laughter. Well, John-Boy could just laugh along in a monotone with his Uncle Emanuel at first not knowing if the situation was really funny.
“Hee-hee!” Uncle Emanuel laughed out loud.
“Yes, hee-hee also!” John-Boy feigned much laughter after watching his uncle carefully for cues to respond in like manner.
"What's are these-here receptors yo' just mentioned, Uncle Emanuel?" John-Boy asked reverting back to speaking in his customary old colored man speak.
"And that-there you just asked is the thousand dollar question, John-Boy! Hee-hee!!" Uncle Emanuel responded back at him in the same dialect adding in some customary jive laughter afterwards. You know the lingo I am referring to here. They both started laughing like those old colored geezers will tend to do while sitting out in their front yards both slapping dominoes and drinking malt liquor. After settling down a bit, Uncle Emanuel further commented, "Imagine that you wanted to create a fish."
"Anyhows . . ., uh, create a fish, you say?" A pondering Jim-Bob mused while scratching his head after which he did some chuckling himself. "Hee-hee!"
"Yes, Jim-Bob!" Uncle Emanuel responded to Jim-Bob after twisting around again to respond to him.
Let's say that for the first model of the fish you make, you decide to take a million and squeeze them all together. Finally, after shaping something into a form that looks similar to a fish, you place all those eyes into salt water. Studying this experiment, you find that instead of swimming around, it dissolves quickly into blindness."
Pausing, Uncle Emanuel came to the realization that Jim-Bob, instead of listening, had fallen fast asleep, "zzz . . .."
Twisting around quickly to continue explaining his point to John-Boy, Uncle Emanuel further expounded, "So, John-Boy, you do understand the point, don't you? The real solution to creating a fish would be to devolve its many eyes into scales. In this way, the vision of the fish would be protected from the salt."
"You did jest' mention how dem' colors of black and white are wrong opposites, Uncle Emanuel? Isn’t the color blue the opposite of red, jest‘ let’s say fer' instance," John-Boy commented demonstrating that he had fallen way behind in the conversation. Still, he was at least attempting to look way far off intelligent and serious like. "Or the color yellow versus brown, let's say in another case. Uh, so that would leave the color green versus what then? Hmmm . . ..? You know, Uncle Emanuel, I've often wondered why kids today have to take drugs in order to see colors? Hell, why don't they jest' open their eyes?"
Again, as if on cue, the catfish jumped clean out from the river falling back within it smacking, splashing, and drenching the three of them.
"Hey!" and "Anyhows!" the two best friends both shouted in unison again cursing at the catfish.
"Hee hee!" Uncle Emanuel once again chuckled at the timing of the circumstance. "In the future, John-Boy, perhaps it would be best for you to stay on topic?"
“Is you ah’ claiming that ‘eyes’ are the ‘source of all things’ Uncle Emanuel?” John-Boy asked of his uncle in quite the pre-Socratic fashion.
“Source of all things?” Uncle Emanuel repeated his nephew's question being rather surprised by it. “What did you just ask me again?”
“Your supposition!” John-Boy asked him again. “What would be the catalyst leading you to state such a postulation?
“Uh?” Uncle Emanuel paused to recollect his thoughts, “I am speaking of a sense organ similar to a sensorium.”
“Anyhows,” Jim-Bob then interjected into the conversation from the back of the boat, “you must be referring to Sir Isaac Newton then.”
After turning a pale white, Uncle Emanuel twisted around to address Jim-Bob, “Excuse me?”
“Oh dear!” John-Boy said shaking his head. “I was afraid this might happen. Looks like Uncle Emanuel’s mental medication has given up on him again.
Sure enough, Uncle Emanuel now appeared frozen, his eyes both wide open and staring straight ahead, and his mouth opened with slobber dribbling from it.
“Quick, help me place this white garment around him, Jim-Bo!” John-Boy asked his best friend.
“Anyhows . . .,” Jim-Bob asked of his best friend in turn, “what's this garment called that we are puttin’ on him?
“It’s called a straight-jacket, Jim-Bo,” John-Boy replied. “It is used for dressing up crazy people.”
“Anyhows, Jay-Bee,” Jim-Bob responded. “it looks a tab uncomfortable.”
“It ain’t supposed to be comfortable, Jim-Bo!” John-Boy responded. “But to keep crazy people from poking their eyes out.”
“Anyhows, Jay-Bee,“ Jim-Bob responded quite concerned, "shouldn’t we at least take in his fishing line?”
“Naw, Jim-Bo!” John-Boy responded back to his best friend, “we can use him for bait.”
Sure enough, looking around the water about the boat, about a dozen catfish had their heads peaking above the water in hopes that Uncle Emanuel would be discarded overboard.
“Pretty funny, huh Jim-Bo?” John-Boy asked Jim-Bob.
“Anyhows . . .,” Jim-Bob responded to John-Boy, “yea, this-here is kind of funny.”
After a bit, John-Boy inquired of his friend Jim-Bob further, “Where on earth did you get all that business about Sir Isaac Newton?”
“Anyhows . . .,” Jim-Bob responded, “jest’ lucky I guess.”
The three of them had decided upon spending a day together upon the mighty Trinity River. The spot where they were fished was a portion of the river that flowed through a wilderness called the Great Urban Forest. In turn, it was located within the thickest of the thicket in Deep South Dallas. Uncle Emanuel often manages to get himself sandwiched between this lovable pair. Indeed, their two heads when put together never quite make up the totality of a complete brain. Because of the many man-eating catfish prowling beneath the surface of the water, diving into the depths below didn't offer Emanuel a means of escape.
"Please Uncle Emanuel!" his nephew pleaded loudly with him. "I'd very much appreciate it hearing you speak mo' about your theory called 'Sensory Devolution!!'"
Caused by John-Boy's outburst, a deep sleeping Jim-Bob awoke startled and shouted, "'Snort' ANYHOWS!"
"For Pete's sake, son!" Uncle Emanuel tried reasoning with his nephew. "You know how my theories can get so complicated at times that they can even escalate beyond my own understanding!"
After reaching one of his huge anomalies into the bait bucket to grab a fistful of crickets to snack upon, John-Boy insisted further, "Munch, munch, munch . . .. Hey, perhaps in learning what is deadly serious about this world, I could mo' bettah' know things are funny?"
With eyes rolling, Uncle Emanuel sighed and relented, "Well, in that case . . .."
"Great! Once upon a time . . . " John-Boy cheered and clapped his hands. He then sat still in anticipation of the telling of a story. He had learned to control himself in such a fashion just recently by twiddling his thumbs. This was a method taught to him by his good mamma in order to better behave in church.
In spite of his naivety about science, John-Boy did have a point. Seems that he had been robbed at birth from ever possessing the ability of knowing when something was truly funny. Oddly, having never been able to perceive what was comedy, he never seemed to get tired of discussing even the most boring of stuff.
After clearing his throat, Uncle Emanuel began lecturing his nephew utilizing complex compound sentences as he did so incorporating semicolons for style, "On one hand, the universe exists wholly apart from God; and, meanwhile, on the other, God Himself exists beyond even this infinity as an unapproachable Organ.
“Organ?” John-Boy inquired.
“Yes John-Boy,” Uncle Emanuel said clarifying, “He exists as a surrounding Heart. Within the immense empowerment of this immense heart, there also exists a single sense organ. Being single, so it is able to perceive only a single color about itself.
Jim-Bob, as he had to sit up to spit out some tobacco anyway, thought it a good time to butt in, "'Spit.' Anyhows . . ., hey-there Uncle Emanuel!"
"Yes, Jim-Bob? the great black sage twisted around to address what he thought was going to be a question.
"Ever hear the one about that-there hairy-frog I used to keep as a pet back when jest' a wee little feller'?"
As if on cue, a large cat-fish jumped clean out from the river to fall back into it smacking, splashing, and drenching onto the three with water.
"Hey!" and "Anyhows!" both of the forty-two year old best friends shouted in unison cursing at the catfish.
"Hee hee!" Uncle Emanuel endured the cold surprise of the splashing water in order to chuckle at the timing of the happening. He then felt invigorated to add insult to injury. "Whew! Oh boy, would I ever love to hear about that-there hairy frog joke of yours, Jim-Bob. Shoot, I bet I've laughed a hundred times at that joke, it gets better every time you say it, and would so love to laugh at it yet again. Just seems the catfish swimming below aren't too interested."
"What sense organ would that be Uncle Emanuel?" John-Boy inquired managing to maintain focus on the discussion at hand.
"Yes, John-Boy, " Uncle Emanuel continued on with his lecturing twisting around to address John-Boy after refocusing on the topic himself, "I am speaking of the infinite universe in this case. On one hand, what surrounds us is a Heart which is located an unapproachable distance away; meanwhile, on the other hand, the infinite universe itself exists as a lone sense organ."
"What is this thing dat’ you keep calling infinity, Uncle Emauel?" John-Boy asked puzzled while scratching his head.
"Imagine that you are now traveling out in deep space in a rocket ship, John-Boy," Uncle Emanuel said hypothesizing, "Okay, one day you arrive at a wall. After stopping, eating a peanut butter sandwich, and drinking some Kool-aid, you wonder to yourself, “What is on the other side?“
After thinking long and hard on the question, John-Boy replied, "Nothing would be on the other side of that-there wall, Uncle Emanuel."
"Uh, okay . . .," Uncle Emanuel replied shaking his head at the unexpected answer and then having to close his eyes to think about what to say next. Becoming enlightened suddenly, he continued on with his dissertation, "Okay, let's venture away from the topic for a bit in order to consider the theory deeper. Imagine, if you will, a race of human beings evolving out from the thickest of jungles. Such a wilderness would be so dense, in fact, that one would only be able to perceive evidence of a sky above on occasion. As the color green of the jungle would be so dominant, the lesser appearance of the other colors of brown, red, black and so on wouldn’t be considered mutually exclusive of that color, but mere shades of it. The few times that the sky above would peak its light through into the forest would lead the trapped victims to assume the same about the color blue as well. One day, the long journey comes to abrupt end leading the trapped victims to a clearing where they are able to behold a magnificent blue sky opening above them. Up in that blue sky also and seeming to float, they perceive fluffy, whitish, and grayish colored clouds. Again, because of their prior experience in the jungle, these colors are assumed to be shades of green as well.
"Anyhows!" Jim-Bob inquired from the back of the boat in puzzled fashion before adding, "What the dickens, you say?"
"I am arguing here against the present accepted dichotomy of the extreme and opposite colors of black and white, Jim-Bob,” Uncle Emanuel said arguing after twisting around to respond to him. "Such colors are assumed to be mutually exclusive of the other. However, if the universe exists as a lone sense organ, then there must also exist only a single color for it to perceive. In such a case, the sense organ would be blind to that single color. In order for the organ to be able to perceive anything, certain amounts of shadows would need to be caste in the way of the light. I am speaking about a need to create eyes within eyes or, better yet, receptors within receptors. In order to achieve this feat, sensory devolution takes place.
"Anyhows . . ., gee, lots of eyes within eyes, you say?" Jim-Bob inquired with a puzzled look after which he took off his hat (something that he rarely ever did outdoors). He then stood up so that he might sit back down again to do some serious thinking about what in the hell he had just heard. All this nervous action by Jim-Bob left his pale face, freckles, and red hair exposed to very much laughter. Well, John-Boy could just laugh along in a monotone with his Uncle Emanuel at first not knowing if the situation was really funny.
“Hee-hee!” Uncle Emanuel laughed out loud.
“Yes, hee-hee also!” John-Boy feigned much laughter after watching his uncle carefully for cues to respond in like manner.
"What's are these-here receptors yo' just mentioned, Uncle Emanuel?" John-Boy asked reverting back to speaking in his customary old colored man speak.
"And that-there you just asked is the thousand dollar question, John-Boy! Hee-hee!!" Uncle Emanuel responded back at him in the same dialect adding in some customary jive laughter afterwards. You know the lingo I am referring to here. They both started laughing like those old colored geezers will tend to do while sitting out in their front yards both slapping dominoes and drinking malt liquor. After settling down a bit, Uncle Emanuel further commented, "Imagine that you wanted to create a fish."
"Anyhows . . ., uh, create a fish, you say?" A pondering Jim-Bob mused while scratching his head after which he did some chuckling himself. "Hee-hee!"
"Yes, Jim-Bob!" Uncle Emanuel responded to Jim-Bob after twisting around again to respond to him.
Let's say that for the first model of the fish you make, you decide to take a million and squeeze them all together. Finally, after shaping something into a form that looks similar to a fish, you place all those eyes into salt water. Studying this experiment, you find that instead of swimming around, it dissolves quickly into blindness."
Pausing, Uncle Emanuel came to the realization that Jim-Bob, instead of listening, had fallen fast asleep, "zzz . . .."
Twisting around quickly to continue explaining his point to John-Boy, Uncle Emanuel further expounded, "So, John-Boy, you do understand the point, don't you? The real solution to creating a fish would be to devolve its many eyes into scales. In this way, the vision of the fish would be protected from the salt."
"You did jest' mention how dem' colors of black and white are wrong opposites, Uncle Emanuel? Isn’t the color blue the opposite of red, jest‘ let’s say fer' instance," John-Boy commented demonstrating that he had fallen way behind in the conversation. Still, he was at least attempting to look way far off intelligent and serious like. "Or the color yellow versus brown, let's say in another case. Uh, so that would leave the color green versus what then? Hmmm . . ..? You know, Uncle Emanuel, I've often wondered why kids today have to take drugs in order to see colors? Hell, why don't they jest' open their eyes?"
Again, as if on cue, the catfish jumped clean out from the river falling back within it smacking, splashing, and drenching the three of them.
"Hey!" and "Anyhows!" the two best friends both shouted in unison again cursing at the catfish.
"Hee hee!" Uncle Emanuel once again chuckled at the timing of the circumstance. "In the future, John-Boy, perhaps it would be best for you to stay on topic?"
“Is you ah’ claiming that ‘eyes’ are the ‘source of all things’ Uncle Emanuel?” John-Boy asked of his uncle in quite the pre-Socratic fashion.
“Source of all things?” Uncle Emanuel repeated his nephew's question being rather surprised by it. “What did you just ask me again?”
“Your supposition!” John-Boy asked him again. “What would be the catalyst leading you to state such a postulation?
“Uh?” Uncle Emanuel paused to recollect his thoughts, “I am speaking of a sense organ similar to a sensorium.”
“Anyhows,” Jim-Bob then interjected into the conversation from the back of the boat, “you must be referring to Sir Isaac Newton then.”
After turning a pale white, Uncle Emanuel twisted around to address Jim-Bob, “Excuse me?”
“Oh dear!” John-Boy said shaking his head. “I was afraid this might happen. Looks like Uncle Emanuel’s mental medication has given up on him again.
Sure enough, Uncle Emanuel now appeared frozen, his eyes both wide open and staring straight ahead, and his mouth opened with slobber dribbling from it.
“Quick, help me place this white garment around him, Jim-Bo!” John-Boy asked his best friend.
“Anyhows . . .,” Jim-Bob asked of his best friend in turn, “what's this garment called that we are puttin’ on him?
“It’s called a straight-jacket, Jim-Bo,” John-Boy replied. “It is used for dressing up crazy people.”
“Anyhows, Jay-Bee,” Jim-Bob responded. “it looks a tab uncomfortable.”
“It ain’t supposed to be comfortable, Jim-Bo!” John-Boy responded. “But to keep crazy people from poking their eyes out.”
“Anyhows, Jay-Bee,“ Jim-Bob responded quite concerned, "shouldn’t we at least take in his fishing line?”
“Naw, Jim-Bo!” John-Boy responded back to his best friend, “we can use him for bait.”
Sure enough, looking around the water about the boat, about a dozen catfish had their heads peaking above the water in hopes that Uncle Emanuel would be discarded overboard.
“Pretty funny, huh Jim-Bo?” John-Boy asked Jim-Bob.
“Anyhows . . .,” Jim-Bob responded to John-Boy, “yea, this-here is kind of funny.”
After a bit, John-Boy inquired of his friend Jim-Bob further, “Where on earth did you get all that business about Sir Isaac Newton?”
“Anyhows . . .,” Jim-Bob responded, “jest’ lucky I guess.”
Tuesday, August 2, 2016
Chapter 2: A Royal Correspondence; Utilizing A New Writing Method in Order to Raise Up a New Kind of American Leader
Do Not Call Them Evil Bastards in Anguish, But Refer to Them as Unconscionable Drunkards in Intelligent Conversation
Woe (Doom) unto those who legislate evil: Isaiah 10:1Change implemented for the sake of the fabrication of legal business is a false virtue. Indeed, as a father must recognize the face of his son and a son that of his father's, paradoxically, pertaining to the most helpful of alterations throughout history, it was always the most precious of amending to an already existing foundation which created the greatest of benefits. Because the largest part of any existing foundation was carried over and provided to us as our inheritance, change should never isolate the people irreverently from their ancestors.
Of late, the executive branch of the U.S. presidency has been belittling our Founding Fathers. In place of standing upon an already existing foundation, they reject our ancestors while quoting themselves, while standing on their own, and while serving as their very own foundation:
Change will not come if we wait for some other person or some other time. We are the ones we've been waiting for. We are the change that we seek - a quote made by those serving today within the modern executive branch of the overall federal power of the United States.Read more at: http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/b/barack_obama.html
Claims that our Founding Fathers implemented great amounts of change rather than amend reverently upon an already existing foundation is a lot of nonsense perpetuated from articulate lawyers farting eloquently from their mouths.
So how can we go about electing people to do as little as possible for our sake?
Well, the best way is to train a new kind of New World leader to replace the Old World lawyers now being deployed in office. In order to achieve this, I have developed a new type of writing method that I call a Royal Correspondence. Indeed, the essay brought over from the Old World does not serve the people of the United States. However, that writing method shouldn't be abolished wholly, but relegated to a lessor important role.
Indeed, how ironic is it that, here in the New World of the United States, we are most threatened by our best recognized universities? I am speaking about those Old World Ivy League Schools whose traditions were already in existence prior to the forming of our new nation.
Beyond the essay, the writing method of a Royal Correspondence should advance the people of the United States setting apart from the Old World. It has seven rules:
Rule 1) The writing method of a royal-correspondence should be both intimate and rational by reducing to the most formal spectrum of a king and a wretch.
Rule 2) The author of a royal correspondence should pretend that he or she is a king.
Rule 3) The author of a royal correspondence should pretend that their reader is the sum total population of the world reduced to within the lone being of a wretch.
Rule 4) The author of a royal correspondence should write in the same harsh elements of hot, cold, rain, and so on that the wretch is having to endure.
Rule 5) The author of a royal correspondence should never condescend towards the wretch. Indeed, he or she should write as in-depth and as complicated as necessary to get his or her meaning across.
Rule 6) A royal correspondence should not exceed one side of a single piece of paper. If a desire exists to be frugal, then just write two correspondences on the paper front and back.
Rule 7) Never submit the finished message to the wretch as she is just a metaphor.
Contrary to what the drunkards in power today are arguing, it is never time for enacting great amounts of change. Instead, it is time we began narrowing power by circumcising the worldly authority of a wayward Emperor towards that of a more proper King-Writ-Large.
Monday, August 1, 2016
Chapter 3) The Unified Field Theory: A Single Force Called The Universal Fathering Effect
The reduction through three levels of the following unified field theory are written in a writing method called a royal correspondence. Again, here are the method's seven rules:
Rule 1) The writing method of a royal-correspondence is both intimate and rational as it is always reducing to the most formal dichotomy of a king and a wretch.
Rule 2) The author of a royal correspondence should pretend that he or she is a king.
Rule 3) Pertaining to the audience he or she is writing towards, the author of a royal correspondence should pretend that their reader is the sum total population of the world reduced to within the lone being of a wretch.
Rule 4) The author of a royal correspondence should write in the same harsh elements that the wretch is having to endure in order to survive.
Rule 5) The author of a royal correspondence should never write condescending towards the wretch; but, rather, he or she should write as in-depth and complicated as necessary in order to get his or her meaning across.
Rule 6) A royal correspondence should not exceed one side of a single piece of paper. If the desire is to be frugal, then one can write two correspondences on the front and back of the paper.
Rule 7) Never submit the finished message to the wretch as she is just a metaphor
Natural Law -- All phenomenon within infinite space exists between the numbers 2 and 0 of the equation (2+0)1/2 = 1. As 2 is equal to 'numbers,' 0 is equal to 'no numbers.' In turn, 1/2 oscillates the sum of 2 to a frequency of 1 universe.
II. The Transitional Chemical Level:
A Missing Piece of the Puzzle
Called CenterPoint-Friction
Natural Law -- There exists two levels in natural science with the macro Universal Fathering Effect being one and the micro physical equation of (2+0)1/2 = 1 being the other. In turn, a chemical level exists as a transition of matter between these two levels. This chemical level is created by a singular force called the Fathering Effect. This singular force, in turn, expresses itself in two phenomenon with one being gravity and the other centerpoint-friction.
a. It is impossible to draw a straight line outside of just expressing it as a concept within the mind
Indeed, a straight line drawn continually around the earth would not be straight, but round. Similarly, relatively speaking, there doesn't exist any fixed bodies in space where a straight line can be drawn between a point A and a point B.
Natural Law -- The image of a straight line is a conceptualize product imagined within a finite mind.
In this case, even the sun is not an anomaly. The argument that it is motionless is not true. The sun not only rotates on its axis, but it tends to wobble also where it is pulled to and fro slightly off center of our solar system.
Natural Law: If no such possibility exists as a straight line in the universe, neither will two bodies be able to travel towards each other along straight paths to the extent that each will collide together at the centerpoints of their relative densities.
Example: Falling meteors from space can only travel to strike the earth along a path that is a curved orbit and never a straight one. In contrast, an inverse traveling rocket taking off, when it is aimed straight up into space. will always veer off its course relative to a viewer from the ground. Therefore, the course and speed of a falling meteor is following the same exact inverse path relative to direction and speed as a rocket travels in order to take off and leave orbit.
In other words, as it leaves a straight path to orbit towards the earth, a meteor accelerates. Just the inverse, as it decelerates from a straight path to orbit around the earth, a rocket decelerates.
When the velocity of bodies at rest are an unknown, physics students are taught to replace the missing variable with the acceleration of gravity which is 9.81 m/s2. In other words, the objects that make up parts of the earth only appear to be at rest. After all, the gravity holding a body together is the overall potential for its individual parts to orbit falling around its centerpoint. However, as these bodies are in constant motion, then, like meteors, they too will never fall directly in a straight fashion towards the earth's centerpoint, but only in an elliptical orbit around it!
Natural Law -- While it is impossible for two bodies in space to impact along a straight line in such a way that they will collide centerpoint to centerpoint relative to their densities, every smaller body appearing to be stuck onto a larger body is actually in orbit around it. Centerpoint Friction repels all bodies away from the centerpoints of other bodies.
Indeed, much like gravity once existed in the open, centerpoint-friction too has existed all along hidden out in plain sight. The reason we have such a difficult time comprehending it isn't because of a matter of a lack of math and / or science, but because of a matter of epistemology.
Natural Law -- While an infinite, limitless, round, and dimensional universe expresses one reality, the interpretation of that universe by a finite, limited, square, and linear mind is a whole other expression of reality altogether.
In order to get a better understanding of what is a dimensional inverse when compared to that of a linear opposite, an odd way of perceiving it, as the gravity of a body in space appears to attract another body towards a direction that is straight on and in a forward fashion, at the same time relative to the viewer, the finite linear mind should be made to understand that centerpoint-friction is also working within the pulling body repelling the pulled body away in a direction towards all sides.
Indeed, if centerpoint-friction could be made to disappear suddenly, then the shapes and motions of the bodies in the universe would disappear. Indeed, there wouldn't even exist any light in which to see them with. Upon factoring the centerpoint-friction back into the fabric, as light would then reappear again instantaneously, the bodies in space would appear taking on both shapes that are round and spherical and motions that are rotating and orbiting.
The Macro Third Level:
The Universal Fathering Effect
As the micro - physical level is expressed by the formula of (2+0)½ = 1, and the transitional chemical level is expressed in the characteristics of gravity and center-point friction, the macro third level of the unified field theory of which I call the Universal Fathering Effect is expressed in terms of both growing and withering stars.
Law of Nature: While nature determines the functioning of growing stars, in turn, the withering stars themselves determine the actions of nature. Therefore, withering stars determine the functions of the growing stars.
A common frequency is created by the long existing withering stars. They develop a cohesive frequency together over time. Meanwhile, in contrast, the frequencies of the new withering stars conflict with the common frequency of the long existing ones.
Law of Nature: The cohesive frequency of withering stars determine what is the structure of the universe. In turn, regarding both inward change and outward motion, the conflict between the cohesive frequency of long established withering stars and that of newly withering ones determines the dynamics of the structure.
Saturday, July 30, 2016
Outline of "Uncle Emanuel's Seven Steps to Understanding Our American Civil Purpose
Table of Contents
Outline
Introduction
Chapter 1) The Formal Truth Engine
Chapter 2) A Training Writing Method Called a Royal Correspondence
Chapter 3) The Unified Field Theory: What is the Universal Fathering Effect?
Chapter 4) A New World Science: What is Sensory Devolution?
Chapter 5) The Proper Being of a King Writ Large Versus the Improper Becoming of an Emperor Needing Circumcision
Chapter 6) The peripheral dichotomies, fabricated movements, and concocted rights: What are the False Powers of Manipulation?
Chapter 7) The People's Proclamation to Intermittent Sovereignty
Outline
Introduction
Chapter 1) The Formal Truth Engine
Chapter 2) A Training Writing Method Called a Royal Correspondence
Chapter 3) The Unified Field Theory: What is the Universal Fathering Effect?
Chapter 4) A New World Science: What is Sensory Devolution?
Chapter 5) The Proper Being of a King Writ Large Versus the Improper Becoming of an Emperor Needing Circumcision
Chapter 6) The peripheral dichotomies, fabricated movements, and concocted rights: What are the False Powers of Manipulation?
Chapter 7) The People's Proclamation to Intermittent Sovereignty
Friday, July 29, 2016
Chapter 1. The Formal Truth Engine
Formal Truth Engine: A rational thought process involving the comparing and contrasting of the many dogmatic dichotomies that we accept today with a more formal and truer dichotomy of a king and wretch -- a best-principled dichotomy so to speak. I say these faultier dichotomies are dogmatic because they are accepted today without giving the matter much thought.
My argument here is that the mind of mankind is being blinded today. This deception is being caused by a bombardment of information pertaining to the peripheral dichotomies. In order to return our proper perception, we need to establish a central formal dichotomy in which to focus our attention upon.
Hopefully, in the future, when others continue desiring to speak with us about matters surrounding the peripheral dichotomies, we will know well enough about the harm such nonsense is causing and walk away.
The primary focus we should all share today is upon both the metaphoric figure of a king at one end of a political spectrum and his inverse of a wretch at the other end of it. In contrast, the political spectrum that we accept today is an ancient left/right golden mean scale developed by Aristotle.
Spiritually speaking, my argument claims that there exists an important formal dichotomy. This best-principled among all lessor dichotomies exists between what is the holiest of dichotomies on one hand, it being the ideal relationship between Christ as the husband and the church as His bride and, on the other hand, the more practical dogmatic dichotomies that we accept without giving the matter much thought.
In other words, while it is important to accept the holy dichotomy as ideal, we need to understand also that a formal reality exists before us out in plain sight when opening our eyes.
Without much thought, we split reality dogmatically into many dichotomies. One such dogmatic dichotomy determines the color black to be at the end of a color spectrum and the color white at the other. Another is male at one end and that of a female at the other. I think of these dogmatic dichotomies as peripheral or faulty dichotomies.
Again, to open our eyes, we need to place things in perspective. As I am a Christian, this means first recognizing Christ as the most holy dichotomy of Himself as the husband and His people as His bride. Next, we must envision a dynamic inverse of a king located at one unapproachable end of a spectrum versus that of a wretch located at the other unapproachable end of it.
I must pause here to interject that a straight line is unique as it exists only as a product of a finite mind. In other words, if desks lined up in sequence numbered sufficient enough to circle the earth, a line drawn by a student shifting from one chair to the next would not be drawn straight, but would circle. Similarly, all things being relative, as all three variables utilized in the following postulation would be in constant motion, it would be impossible for a student sitting as a reference point to draw a line between a body in space serving as point A, over to that of another body in space as point B.
This is why I refer to this new type of political spectrum as a dynamic inverse.
One can work out problems by utilizing this dynamic inverse. This learning method entails comparing and contrasting the one focused upon formal dichotomy with that of the other lessor informal or, better yet, faultier peripheral dichotomies.
For example, to the question asked about what are the inductive and deductive methods of reasoning? Well, my answer to that question is, while the worthless wretch at one end of the spectrum would be ignorant of such processes having other more desperate matters to attend to, the king, at the other end of it, would surround himself with aristocratic officials who understood how both of these rational truth engines function.
The King's deemed experts would understand how Socrates in ancient Greece developed a rational inductive method that he coined 'the Dialectic.' This method today is often referred to as 'The Socratic Teaching Method.' Later, building upon the rational foundation laid down by both Socrates and Plato, Aristotle developed the backbone of present science as formal logic, the four causes, and what is today recognized as deductive reasoning.
Without the utilization of this Truth Engine with it being a process of juxtaposing the many faultier peripheral dichotomies with that of a best-principled formal dichotomy, our minds are being deceived into viewing reality as Marxism versus capitalism, male versus female, rich against poor, black against white, homosexual versus heterosexual, and so on for infinity. The Truth Engine works by defining how the polar ends of these peripheral dichotomies aren't truly mutually exclusive of the other.
Indeed, Marxism and capitalism are not mutually exclusive polar ends of the other, but both are evil. The common denominator they share as enemies against the people is how they both threaten to take away our natural rights. As a drunken Marxist is attempting to subvert us constantly of our rights, the equally drunken capitalist simply doesn't acknowledge that such rights exist.
We need to stop thinking of reality in terms of linear opposites and perceiving them more in terms of a dynamic inverse. Using gravity as an example, understanding it in a linear way, we would tend to envision its opposite repelling force as a linear opposite. As gravity appears to pull on us in a straight linear fashion, so a repelling force should appear to be pushing us away in a straight linear fashion as well. This perception is a fallacy however.
In order to begin to understand how the universe truly works, while the finite mind does perceive gravity to exist in a linear fashion as a force pulling on our being straight ahead and forward, a better way one should think about an inverse repelling force opposing it would be that it is pushing us away from the center towards the sides in all directions. As this repelling force is pushing away towards all sides, so I refer to that phenomena as 'Centerpoint-Friction."
Again, Centerpoint Friction and Gravity are not linear opposites as that is just how the finite mind tends to interpret the relationship between them. Instead, they exist as dynamic inverses. Similarly, while the original understanding of the dichotomy between a king and a wretch will begin to view them along a spectrum that is a linear opposite, ones mind should persevere to develop a more mature understanding of their relationship together as a round dynamic inverse.
My argument here is that the mind of mankind is being blinded today. This deception is being caused by a bombardment of information pertaining to the peripheral dichotomies. In order to return our proper perception, we need to establish a central formal dichotomy in which to focus our attention upon.
Hopefully, in the future, when others continue desiring to speak with us about matters surrounding the peripheral dichotomies, we will know well enough about the harm such nonsense is causing and walk away.
The primary focus we should all share today is upon both the metaphoric figure of a king at one end of a political spectrum and his inverse of a wretch at the other end of it. In contrast, the political spectrum that we accept today is an ancient left/right golden mean scale developed by Aristotle.
Spiritually speaking, my argument claims that there exists an important formal dichotomy. This best-principled among all lessor dichotomies exists between what is the holiest of dichotomies on one hand, it being the ideal relationship between Christ as the husband and the church as His bride and, on the other hand, the more practical dogmatic dichotomies that we accept without giving the matter much thought.
In other words, while it is important to accept the holy dichotomy as ideal, we need to understand also that a formal reality exists before us out in plain sight when opening our eyes.
Without much thought, we split reality dogmatically into many dichotomies. One such dogmatic dichotomy determines the color black to be at the end of a color spectrum and the color white at the other. Another is male at one end and that of a female at the other. I think of these dogmatic dichotomies as peripheral or faulty dichotomies.
Again, to open our eyes, we need to place things in perspective. As I am a Christian, this means first recognizing Christ as the most holy dichotomy of Himself as the husband and His people as His bride. Next, we must envision a dynamic inverse of a king located at one unapproachable end of a spectrum versus that of a wretch located at the other unapproachable end of it.
I must pause here to interject that a straight line is unique as it exists only as a product of a finite mind. In other words, if desks lined up in sequence numbered sufficient enough to circle the earth, a line drawn by a student shifting from one chair to the next would not be drawn straight, but would circle. Similarly, all things being relative, as all three variables utilized in the following postulation would be in constant motion, it would be impossible for a student sitting as a reference point to draw a line between a body in space serving as point A, over to that of another body in space as point B.
This is why I refer to this new type of political spectrum as a dynamic inverse.
One can work out problems by utilizing this dynamic inverse. This learning method entails comparing and contrasting the one focused upon formal dichotomy with that of the other lessor informal or, better yet, faultier peripheral dichotomies.
For example, to the question asked about what are the inductive and deductive methods of reasoning? Well, my answer to that question is, while the worthless wretch at one end of the spectrum would be ignorant of such processes having other more desperate matters to attend to, the king, at the other end of it, would surround himself with aristocratic officials who understood how both of these rational truth engines function.
The King's deemed experts would understand how Socrates in ancient Greece developed a rational inductive method that he coined 'the Dialectic.' This method today is often referred to as 'The Socratic Teaching Method.' Later, building upon the rational foundation laid down by both Socrates and Plato, Aristotle developed the backbone of present science as formal logic, the four causes, and what is today recognized as deductive reasoning.
Without the utilization of this Truth Engine with it being a process of juxtaposing the many faultier peripheral dichotomies with that of a best-principled formal dichotomy, our minds are being deceived into viewing reality as Marxism versus capitalism, male versus female, rich against poor, black against white, homosexual versus heterosexual, and so on for infinity. The Truth Engine works by defining how the polar ends of these peripheral dichotomies aren't truly mutually exclusive of the other.
Indeed, Marxism and capitalism are not mutually exclusive polar ends of the other, but both are evil. The common denominator they share as enemies against the people is how they both threaten to take away our natural rights. As a drunken Marxist is attempting to subvert us constantly of our rights, the equally drunken capitalist simply doesn't acknowledge that such rights exist.
We need to stop thinking of reality in terms of linear opposites and perceiving them more in terms of a dynamic inverse. Using gravity as an example, understanding it in a linear way, we would tend to envision its opposite repelling force as a linear opposite. As gravity appears to pull on us in a straight linear fashion, so a repelling force should appear to be pushing us away in a straight linear fashion as well. This perception is a fallacy however.
In order to begin to understand how the universe truly works, while the finite mind does perceive gravity to exist in a linear fashion as a force pulling on our being straight ahead and forward, a better way one should think about an inverse repelling force opposing it would be that it is pushing us away from the center towards the sides in all directions. As this repelling force is pushing away towards all sides, so I refer to that phenomena as 'Centerpoint-Friction."
Again, Centerpoint Friction and Gravity are not linear opposites as that is just how the finite mind tends to interpret the relationship between them. Instead, they exist as dynamic inverses. Similarly, while the original understanding of the dichotomy between a king and a wretch will begin to view them along a spectrum that is a linear opposite, ones mind should persevere to develop a more mature understanding of their relationship together as a round dynamic inverse.
Thursday, July 28, 2016
Preface to Uncle Emanuel's Steps to Understanding Our American Civil Purpose
(Our American Civil Purpose)
Preface
To cover up information in order to stumble up God’s children is not an intelligent endeavor. The gospel of Christ was spoken freely out in the open by the very least one of us to ever live. Indeed, from all He ever understood of Himself, Christ confessed to being the very least offspring born and raised among the most wretched. After all, He did refer to Himself only as the Son of Man.
In contrast to the Son of Man, a ‘Son of God‘ is exalted as a princely offspring of a king. As, on one hand, the classification of ‘God‘ denotes the intimate designation of one who is a friend, on the other, the classification of ’man’ denotes the impersonal designation of one who is a stranger. My claim that Christ the Son of man be the living Son of God is my own faithful proclamation of His holy stature and not His!
Similar to Christ, Americans today are worthless children of a wretch. Being this American is an absolute. Indeed, being so is not a matter of opinion. It is neither this nor that, left nor right, liberal nor conservative, nor Democratic and Republican. The certainty and the assurance that we are Americans is established soundly in formal natural law. After all, our nation is an unofficial one as it was never established by officials according to established legal precedence, but upon a formal foundation of, by, and for the people. This can be substantiated within U.S. Constitution which is not a single document, but has two kinds of laws instituted within it. One kind is based upon those prior Old World traditions of legal precedence that were carried over within the beings of our Founding Fathers. The other kind are based upon formal natural law. Within the portion of the U.S. Constitution that is formal, natural law establishes an economy of natural rights which are our Bill of Rights.
The United States today is set apart from the Old World not because of legal precedence, but because of this formal natural right economy.
Today, neither Marxism and capitalism are friends of our natural right economy. As they share a similar goal as enemies of the people, these seeming differing political philosophies are not mutually exclusive. They both wish to disarm and confuse stripping us of what we can never lose. Indeed, as the Marxists of today continue in their scheming to subvert us of our natural rights, the arrogant capitalists continue in ignorance as they don't even acknowledge their unalienable existence. One cannot take away that which is etched so indelibly upon the soul, but can confuse and disarm by convincing others that it isn’t there. Metaphorically speaking, the American people were never intended to be prostituted so shamefully by two competing pimps.
The necessary tyranny of the federal government today does not govern over the world’s greatest business executives, military leaders, lawyers, doctors, or bankers -- that is all Old World business; but, we of the United States possess the greatest of people when we are left free to express our American Civil Purpose.
*Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins
Prime Minister of These United States
*Literally means ‘founder.' A new kind of leader other than a lawyer. 'Fd.' is a title given to a prime minister or deputy prime minister of the United States.
Preface
To cover up information in order to stumble up God’s children is not an intelligent endeavor. The gospel of Christ was spoken freely out in the open by the very least one of us to ever live. Indeed, from all He ever understood of Himself, Christ confessed to being the very least offspring born and raised among the most wretched. After all, He did refer to Himself only as the Son of Man.
But Jesus replied, "Foxes have dens to live in, and birds have nests, but the Son of Man has no place even to lay his head." Luke 9:58
In contrast to the Son of Man, a ‘Son of God‘ is exalted as a princely offspring of a king. As, on one hand, the classification of ‘God‘ denotes the intimate designation of one who is a friend, on the other, the classification of ’man’ denotes the impersonal designation of one who is a stranger. My claim that Christ the Son of man be the living Son of God is my own faithful proclamation of His holy stature and not His!
Similar to Christ, Americans today are worthless children of a wretch. Being this American is an absolute. Indeed, being so is not a matter of opinion. It is neither this nor that, left nor right, liberal nor conservative, nor Democratic and Republican. The certainty and the assurance that we are Americans is established soundly in formal natural law. After all, our nation is an unofficial one as it was never established by officials according to established legal precedence, but upon a formal foundation of, by, and for the people. This can be substantiated within U.S. Constitution which is not a single document, but has two kinds of laws instituted within it. One kind is based upon those prior Old World traditions of legal precedence that were carried over within the beings of our Founding Fathers. The other kind are based upon formal natural law. Within the portion of the U.S. Constitution that is formal, natural law establishes an economy of natural rights which are our Bill of Rights.
The United States today is set apart from the Old World not because of legal precedence, but because of this formal natural right economy.
Today, neither Marxism and capitalism are friends of our natural right economy. As they share a similar goal as enemies of the people, these seeming differing political philosophies are not mutually exclusive. They both wish to disarm and confuse stripping us of what we can never lose. Indeed, as the Marxists of today continue in their scheming to subvert us of our natural rights, the arrogant capitalists continue in ignorance as they don't even acknowledge their unalienable existence. One cannot take away that which is etched so indelibly upon the soul, but can confuse and disarm by convincing others that it isn’t there. Metaphorically speaking, the American people were never intended to be prostituted so shamefully by two competing pimps.
The necessary tyranny of the federal government today does not govern over the world’s greatest business executives, military leaders, lawyers, doctors, or bankers -- that is all Old World business; but, we of the United States possess the greatest of people when we are left free to express our American Civil Purpose.
*Fd. Uncle Emanuel Watkins
Prime Minister of These United States
*Literally means ‘founder.' A new kind of leader other than a lawyer. 'Fd.' is a title given to a prime minister or deputy prime minister of the United States.
Monday, July 25, 2016
Understanding Our American Civil Purpose: Seven Steps by Uncle Emanuel Watkins
Outline
Understanding Our American Civil Purpose in Seven Steps
by Uncle Emanuel Watkins
1) The Formal Truth Engine: A Rationl Method For the New World
2) A Royal Correspondence: A Formal Writing Method to Supersede that of the Classic Essay.
3) Science and Sensory Devolution
4) Epistemology and The Fathering Effect
5) A New Leadership Of, By, and For the People: A Fellowship of Prime Ministers
6) The False Powers of Manipulation.
7) The Gospel of Christ: How the Natural Rights Came to be Etched Upon Our Souls and Justification For the People to Intervene at Times Into the Affairs of Our Government.
Understanding Our American Civil Purpose in Seven Steps
by Uncle Emanuel Watkins
1) The Formal Truth Engine: A Rationl Method For the New World
2) A Royal Correspondence: A Formal Writing Method to Supersede that of the Classic Essay.
3) Science and Sensory Devolution
4) Epistemology and The Fathering Effect
5) A New Leadership Of, By, and For the People: A Fellowship of Prime Ministers
6) The False Powers of Manipulation.
7) The Gospel of Christ: How the Natural Rights Came to be Etched Upon Our Souls and Justification For the People to Intervene at Times Into the Affairs of Our Government.
What is The Formal Truth Engine?
Formal Truth Engine: A rational thought process involving the comparing and contrasting of the many dogmatic dichotomies accepted today with that of a more formal and truer dichotomy. This formal dichotomy utilizes a metaphorical king at one end of a political spectrum and his inverse of a metaphorical wretch at the other end of it.
Spiritually speaking, my argument makes the claim that there exists another formal dichotomy existing between what is the holy dichotomy of Christ (the husband) and the church (the bride), with this marriage provided to us by God, and what are the more practical dogmatic dichotomies.
In other words, while it is important to understand the holy dichotomy, we need to also understand the reality that exists before us when we open our eyes.
Without much thought, reality is split dogmatically by our finite minds into many dichotomies. One such dichotomy places the color black at one end of a spectrum and that of the color white at the other. Another dogmatic dichotomy is male at one end and female at the other. I think of these dogmatic dichotomies as peripheral or faulty dichotomies.
Opening our eyes, by utilized the Formal Truth Engine, we begin to envision a king located at one unapproachable end of a spectrum versus that of a wretch located at the other unapproachabe end of it. One then works out the process by comparing and contrasting this most formal of all dichotomies with all the other informal and more faulty peripheral dichotomies.
For example, to the question of what are inductive and deductive reasoning? Well, my answer to that question is while the wretch is ignorant of such processes, the king has surrounded himself with officials who understand how both of these rational truth engines function.
Again, some of the informal dichotomies accepted by us today might be Marxism versus capitalism, male versus female, rich against poor, black against white, homosexual versus heterosexual, and so on. The idea here is to define how these peripheral dichotomies exist mutually exclusive or a polar opposite direction of each other. One utilizes the Formal Truth Engine to juxtapose the peripheral dichotomies with that of the one true dichotomy.
In other words, I reject the left / right political spectrum. It projects the fallacy of a square linear opposite. In place of it, I insert a round 'dynamic inverse.'
What is the difference between a linear opposite and a dynamic inverse? Well, I explain this not by the process of science, but by an example of epistemology. In other words, it isn't that we don't know, but why we aren't able to perceive what already exists in plain sight. Utilize gravity as an example by thinking of it as a force pulling us straight ahead towards it. In contrast to gravity, in our finite limited minds, we would tend to envision that any potential repelling force would behave in an exact linear opposite direction. It would be pushing us away. This perception is a fallacy however.
In order to begin to understand how the universe truly works, while the mind interprets gravity in linear fashion as a force pulling us straight ahead and forward, one should think of its inverse repelling force as pushing us away from the center in all directions towards the sides. As the repelling force is pushing away towards all sides, so I have referred to that phenomena as 'Centerpoint-Friction."
The forces of Centerpoint Friction and Gravity are not linear opposites as that is how our minds tend to interpret the relationship between them. Instead, they exist as dynamic inverses. Similarly, while the original understanding of the dichotomy between a king and a wretch will be along a spectrum that is a linear opposite, one should persevere to develop the understanding of their relationship to more of a round dynamic inverse.
Spiritually speaking, my argument makes the claim that there exists another formal dichotomy existing between what is the holy dichotomy of Christ (the husband) and the church (the bride), with this marriage provided to us by God, and what are the more practical dogmatic dichotomies.
In other words, while it is important to understand the holy dichotomy, we need to also understand the reality that exists before us when we open our eyes.
Without much thought, reality is split dogmatically by our finite minds into many dichotomies. One such dichotomy places the color black at one end of a spectrum and that of the color white at the other. Another dogmatic dichotomy is male at one end and female at the other. I think of these dogmatic dichotomies as peripheral or faulty dichotomies.
Opening our eyes, by utilized the Formal Truth Engine, we begin to envision a king located at one unapproachable end of a spectrum versus that of a wretch located at the other unapproachabe end of it. One then works out the process by comparing and contrasting this most formal of all dichotomies with all the other informal and more faulty peripheral dichotomies.
For example, to the question of what are inductive and deductive reasoning? Well, my answer to that question is while the wretch is ignorant of such processes, the king has surrounded himself with officials who understand how both of these rational truth engines function.
Again, some of the informal dichotomies accepted by us today might be Marxism versus capitalism, male versus female, rich against poor, black against white, homosexual versus heterosexual, and so on. The idea here is to define how these peripheral dichotomies exist mutually exclusive or a polar opposite direction of each other. One utilizes the Formal Truth Engine to juxtapose the peripheral dichotomies with that of the one true dichotomy.
In other words, I reject the left / right political spectrum. It projects the fallacy of a square linear opposite. In place of it, I insert a round 'dynamic inverse.'
What is the difference between a linear opposite and a dynamic inverse? Well, I explain this not by the process of science, but by an example of epistemology. In other words, it isn't that we don't know, but why we aren't able to perceive what already exists in plain sight. Utilize gravity as an example by thinking of it as a force pulling us straight ahead towards it. In contrast to gravity, in our finite limited minds, we would tend to envision that any potential repelling force would behave in an exact linear opposite direction. It would be pushing us away. This perception is a fallacy however.
In order to begin to understand how the universe truly works, while the mind interprets gravity in linear fashion as a force pulling us straight ahead and forward, one should think of its inverse repelling force as pushing us away from the center in all directions towards the sides. As the repelling force is pushing away towards all sides, so I have referred to that phenomena as 'Centerpoint-Friction."
The forces of Centerpoint Friction and Gravity are not linear opposites as that is how our minds tend to interpret the relationship between them. Instead, they exist as dynamic inverses. Similarly, while the original understanding of the dichotomy between a king and a wretch will be along a spectrum that is a linear opposite, one should persevere to develop the understanding of their relationship to more of a round dynamic inverse.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)