Chapter 2: A Royal Correspondence; Utilizing A New Writing Method in Order to Raise Up a New Kind of American Leader

Do Not Call Them Evil Bastards in Anguish, But Refer to Them as Unconscionable Drunkards in Intelligent Conversation 

Woe (Doom) unto those who legislate evil: Isaiah 10:1

Change implemented for the sake of the fabrication of legal business is a false virtue.  Indeed, as a father must recognize the face of his son and a son that of his father's, paradoxically, pertaining to the most helpful of alterations throughout history, it was always the most precious of amending to an already existing foundation which created the greatest of benefits.  Because the largest part of any existing foundation was carried over and provided to us as our inheritance, change should never isolate the people irreverently from their ancestors.

Of late, the executive branch of the U.S. presidency has been belittling our Founding Fathers.  In place of standing upon an already existing foundation, they reject our ancestors while quoting themselves, while standing on their own, and while serving as their very own foundation:

Change will not come if we wait for some other person or some other time. We are the ones we've been waiting for. We are the change that we seek - a quote made by those serving today within the modern executive branch of the overall federal power of the United States.  

Read more at: http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/b/barack_obama.html
  
Claims that our Founding Fathers implemented great amounts of change rather than amend reverently upon an already existing foundation is a lot of nonsense perpetuated from articulate lawyers farting eloquently from their mouths.

So how can we go about electing people to do as little as possible for our sake?

Well, the best way is to train a new kind of New World leader to replace the Old World lawyers now being deployed in office.  In order to achieve this, I have developed a new type of writing method that I call a Royal Correspondence.  Indeed, the essay brought over from the Old World does not serve the people of the United States.  However, that writing method shouldn't be abolished wholly, but relegated to a lessor important role.

Indeed, how ironic is it that, here in the New World of the United States, we are most threatened by our best recognized universities?  I am speaking about those Old World Ivy League Schools whose traditions were already in existence prior to the forming of our new nation.

Beyond the essay, the writing method of a Royal Correspondence should advance the people of the United States setting apart from the Old World.  It has seven rules:

Rule 1) The writing method of a royal-correspondence should be both intimate and rational by reducing to the most formal spectrum of a king and a wretch.

Rule 2) The author of a royal correspondence should pretend that he or she is a king.

Rule 3) The author of a royal correspondence should pretend that their reader is the sum total population of the world reduced to within the lone being of a wretch.

Rule 4) The author of a royal correspondence should write in the same harsh elements of hot, cold, rain, and so on that the wretch is having to endure.

Rule 5) The author of a royal correspondence should never condescend towards the wretch. Indeed, he or she should write as in-depth and as complicated as necessary to get his or her meaning across.

Rule 6) A royal correspondence should not exceed one side of a single piece of paper. If a desire exists to be frugal, then just write two correspondences on the paper front and back.

Rule 7) Never submit the finished message to the wretch as she is just a metaphor.

Contrary to what the drunkards in power today are arguing, it is never time for enacting great amounts of change.  Instead, it is time we began narrowing power by circumcising the worldly authority of a wayward Emperor towards that of a more proper King-Writ-Large.