The reduction through three levels of the following unified field theory are written in a writing method called a royal correspondence. Again, here are the method's seven rules:
Rule 1) The writing method of a royal-correspondence is both intimate and rational as it is always reducing to the most formal dichotomy of a king and a wretch.
Rule 2) The author of a royal correspondence should pretend that he or she is a king.
Rule 3) Pertaining to the audience he or she is writing towards, the author of a royal correspondence should pretend that their reader is the sum total population of the world reduced to within the lone being of a wretch.
Rule 4) The author of a royal correspondence should write in the same harsh elements that the wretch is having to endure in order to survive.
Rule 5) The author of a royal correspondence should never write condescending towards the wretch; but, rather, he or she should write as in-depth and complicated as necessary in order to get his or her meaning across.
Rule 6) A royal correspondence should not exceed one side of a single piece of paper. If the desire is to be frugal, then one can write two correspondences on the front and back of the paper.
Rule 7) Never submit the finished message to the wretch as she is just a metaphor
Natural Law -- All phenomenon within infinite space exists between the numbers 2 and 0 of the equation (2+0)1/2 = 1. As 2 is equal to 'numbers,' 0 is equal to 'no numbers.' In turn, 1/2 oscillates the sum of 2 to a frequency of 1 universe.
II. The Transitional Chemical Level:
A Missing Piece of the Puzzle
Called CenterPoint-Friction
Natural Law -- There exists two levels in natural science with the macro Universal Fathering Effect being one and the micro physical equation of (2+0)1/2 = 1 being the other. In turn, a chemical level exists as a transition of matter between these two levels. This chemical level is created by a singular force called the Fathering Effect. This singular force, in turn, expresses itself in two phenomenon with one being gravity and the other centerpoint-friction.
a. It is impossible to draw a straight line outside of just expressing it as a concept within the mind
Indeed, a straight line drawn continually around the earth would not be straight, but round. Similarly, relatively speaking, there doesn't exist any fixed bodies in space where a straight line can be drawn between a point A and a point B.
Natural Law -- The image of a straight line is a conceptualize product imagined within a finite mind.
In this case, even the sun is not an anomaly. The argument that it is motionless is not true. The sun not only rotates on its axis, but it tends to wobble also where it is pulled to and fro slightly off center of our solar system.
Natural Law: If no such possibility exists as a straight line in the universe, neither will two bodies be able to travel towards each other along straight paths to the extent that each will collide together at the centerpoints of their relative densities.
Example: Falling meteors from space can only travel to strike the earth along a path that is a curved orbit and never a straight one. In contrast, an inverse traveling rocket taking off, when it is aimed straight up into space. will always veer off its course relative to a viewer from the ground. Therefore, the course and speed of a falling meteor is following the same exact inverse path relative to direction and speed as a rocket travels in order to take off and leave orbit.
In other words, as it leaves a straight path to orbit towards the earth, a meteor accelerates. Just the inverse, as it decelerates from a straight path to orbit around the earth, a rocket decelerates.
When the velocity of bodies at rest are an unknown, physics students are taught to replace the missing variable with the acceleration of gravity which is 9.81 m/s2. In other words, the objects that make up parts of the earth only appear to be at rest. After all, the gravity holding a body together is the overall potential for its individual parts to orbit falling around its centerpoint. However, as these bodies are in constant motion, then, like meteors, they too will never fall directly in a straight fashion towards the earth's centerpoint, but only in an elliptical orbit around it!
Natural Law -- While it is impossible for two bodies in space to impact along a straight line in such a way that they will collide centerpoint to centerpoint relative to their densities, every smaller body appearing to be stuck onto a larger body is actually in orbit around it. Centerpoint Friction repels all bodies away from the centerpoints of other bodies.
Indeed, much like gravity once existed in the open, centerpoint-friction too has existed all along hidden out in plain sight. The reason we have such a difficult time comprehending it isn't because of a matter of a lack of math and / or science, but because of a matter of epistemology.
Natural Law -- While an infinite, limitless, round, and dimensional universe expresses one reality, the interpretation of that universe by a finite, limited, square, and linear mind is a whole other expression of reality altogether.
In order to get a better understanding of what is a dimensional inverse when compared to that of a linear opposite, an odd way of perceiving it, as the gravity of a body in space appears to attract another body towards a direction that is straight on and in a forward fashion, at the same time relative to the viewer, the finite linear mind should be made to understand that centerpoint-friction is also working within the pulling body repelling the pulled body away in a direction towards all sides.
Indeed, if centerpoint-friction could be made to disappear suddenly, then the shapes and motions of the bodies in the universe would disappear. Indeed, there wouldn't even exist any light in which to see them with. Upon factoring the centerpoint-friction back into the fabric, as light would then reappear again instantaneously, the bodies in space would appear taking on both shapes that are round and spherical and motions that are rotating and orbiting.
The Macro Third Level:
The Universal Fathering Effect
As the micro - physical level is expressed by the formula of (2+0)½ = 1, and the transitional chemical level is expressed in the characteristics of gravity and center-point friction, the macro third level of the unified field theory of which I call the Universal Fathering Effect is expressed in terms of both growing and withering stars.
Law of Nature: While nature determines the functioning of growing stars, in turn, the withering stars themselves determine the actions of nature. Therefore, withering stars determine the functions of the growing stars.
A common frequency is created by the long existing withering stars. They develop a cohesive frequency together over time. Meanwhile, in contrast, the frequencies of the new withering stars conflict with the common frequency of the long existing ones.
Law of Nature: The cohesive frequency of withering stars determine what is the structure of the universe. In turn, regarding both inward change and outward motion, the conflict between the cohesive frequency of long established withering stars and that of newly withering ones determines the dynamics of the structure.
No comments:
Post a Comment