Formal Truth Engine: A rational thought process involving the comparing and contrasting of the many dogmatic dichotomies that we accept today with a more formal and truer dichotomy of a king and wretch -- a best-principled dichotomy so to speak. I say these faultier dichotomies are dogmatic because they are accepted today without giving the matter much thought.
My argument here is that the mind of mankind is being blinded today. This deception is being caused by a bombardment of information pertaining to the peripheral dichotomies. In order to return our proper perception, we need to establish a central formal dichotomy in which to focus our attention upon.
Hopefully, in the future, when others continue desiring to speak with us about matters surrounding the peripheral dichotomies, we will know well enough about the harm such nonsense is causing and walk away.
The primary focus we should all share today is upon both the metaphoric figure of a king at one end of a political spectrum and his inverse of a wretch at the other end of it. In contrast, the political spectrum that we accept today is an ancient left/right golden mean scale developed by Aristotle.
Spiritually speaking, my argument claims that there exists an important formal dichotomy. This best-principled among all lessor dichotomies exists between what is the holiest of dichotomies on one hand, it being the ideal relationship between Christ as the husband and the church as His bride and, on the other hand, the more practical dogmatic dichotomies that we accept without giving the matter much thought.
In other words, while it is important to accept the holy dichotomy as ideal, we need to understand also that a formal reality exists before us out in plain sight when opening our eyes.
Without much thought, we split reality dogmatically into many dichotomies. One such dogmatic dichotomy determines the color black to be at the end of a color spectrum and the color white at the other. Another is male at one end and that of a female at the other. I think of these dogmatic dichotomies as peripheral or faulty dichotomies.
Again, to open our eyes, we need to place things in perspective. As I am a Christian, this means first recognizing Christ as the most holy dichotomy of Himself as the husband and His people as His bride. Next, we must envision a dynamic inverse of a king located at one unapproachable end of a spectrum versus that of a wretch located at the other unapproachable end of it.
I must pause here to interject that a straight line is unique as it exists only as a product of a finite mind. In other words, if desks lined up in sequence numbered sufficient enough to circle the earth, a line drawn by a student shifting from one chair to the next would not be drawn straight, but would circle. Similarly, all things being relative, as all three variables utilized in the following postulation would be in constant motion, it would be impossible for a student sitting as a reference point to draw a line between a body in space serving as point A, over to that of another body in space as point B.
This is why I refer to this new type of political spectrum as a dynamic inverse.
One can work out problems by utilizing this dynamic inverse. This learning method entails comparing and contrasting the one focused upon formal dichotomy with that of the other lessor informal or, better yet, faultier peripheral dichotomies.
For example, to the question asked about what are the inductive and deductive methods of reasoning? Well, my answer to that question is, while the worthless wretch at one end of the spectrum would be ignorant of such processes having other more desperate matters to attend to, the king, at the other end of it, would surround himself with aristocratic officials who understood how both of these rational truth engines function.
The King's deemed experts would understand how Socrates in ancient Greece developed a rational inductive method that he coined 'the Dialectic.' This method today is often referred to as 'The Socratic Teaching Method.' Later, building upon the rational foundation laid down by both Socrates and Plato, Aristotle developed the backbone of present science as formal logic, the four causes, and what is today recognized as deductive reasoning.
Without the utilization of this Truth Engine with it being a process of juxtaposing the many faultier peripheral dichotomies with that of a best-principled formal dichotomy, our minds are being deceived into viewing reality as Marxism versus capitalism, male versus female, rich against poor, black against white, homosexual versus heterosexual, and so on for infinity. The Truth Engine works by defining how the polar ends of these peripheral dichotomies aren't truly mutually exclusive of the other.
Indeed, Marxism and capitalism are not mutually exclusive polar ends of the other, but both are evil. The common denominator they share as enemies against the people is how they both threaten to take away our natural rights. As a drunken Marxist is attempting to subvert us constantly of our rights, the equally drunken capitalist simply doesn't acknowledge that such rights exist.
We need to stop thinking of reality in terms of linear opposites and perceiving them more in terms of a dynamic inverse. Using gravity as an example, understanding it in a linear way, we would tend to envision its opposite repelling force as a linear opposite. As gravity appears to pull on us in a straight linear fashion, so a repelling force should appear to be pushing us away in a straight linear fashion as well. This perception is a fallacy however.
In order to begin to understand how the universe truly works, while the finite mind does perceive gravity to exist in a linear fashion as a force pulling on our being straight ahead and forward, a better way one should think about an inverse repelling force opposing it would be that it is pushing us away from the center towards the sides in all directions. As this repelling force is pushing away towards all sides, so I refer to that phenomena as 'Centerpoint-Friction."
Again, Centerpoint Friction and Gravity are not linear opposites as that is just how the finite mind tends to interpret the relationship between them. Instead, they exist as dynamic inverses. Similarly, while the original understanding of the dichotomy between a king and a wretch will begin to view them along a spectrum that is a linear opposite, ones mind should persevere to develop a more mature understanding of their relationship together as a round dynamic inverse.
No comments:
Post a Comment